 |
Applications
are evaluated by a committee of six scholars from the
humanities, arts, and sciences.
Applications are evaluated according to the criteria
detailed under Project
Design. The questions that applicants should particularly
keep in mind when putting together their proposals
are
- Does the project uphold the highest standards
of contemporary scholarship?
- Is the project truly based upon teamwork and collaboration?
- Does the project envisage an innovative output
that either combines traditional outputs with new
ones or devises new outputs altogether?
Reasons that past applications have been rejected
include the following:
- The project was not truly grounded in the humanities.
- The project was unclear about the intended output,
had no clear output in sight, or did not adequately
consider how to achieve its aims.
- Student researchers were not envisaged as full-fledged
academic team members but errand-runners, data-entry
workers, etc.
- The proposed research team was ill-adapted to
the project goals.
- There was no room for undergraduates on the team.
- The project goals did not carry humanistic thought
forward but merely replicated past research.
- The applicants were unaware of research already
done on the subject.
- The proposal did not communicate effectively
the ways that it meets SHL criteria.
|
|