| |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
Defining
Characteristics
 |
Collaboration
- Projects involve scholars at all levels
-- senior & junior faculty, staff, postdocs,
grads, & undergrads
- Team members are categorized as "core
personnel," "contributors,"
or "technical advisors," regardless
of academic rank
- Led by faculty coordinators, teamwork is
consensus-driven, and involves tasking by
subtopic instead of rank
- Quarterly meetings of all researchers connected
with SHL permit crosspollination between projects
- Periodic seminars for undergrad researchers
prepare them for full participation in teams,
as well as foster crossdisciplinary inquiry
and dialogue
- Collaboration between SHL projects and
with SCIL, Media-X, and WGLN, thanks to shared
workspaces in the new Wallenberg Hall.
- SHL staff consult on all projects and promote
collaboration between teams, between disciplines,
between schools of the university, between
academic and administrative units, and between
Stanford, other universities, public institutions
and the community
|
Technology
- Driven by research agendas from within
the humanities disciplines, all projects embrace
non-traditional (to the humanities) outputs,
linking cutting-edge humanities research to
technological innovation
- Even where the primary outputs are only
partly digital (as in the case of films, exhibits,
etc.), they are achieved by means of the most
effective new IT tools
- The SHL Directors help teams both to execute
their ideas and to imagine possibilities (as
humanists are often constrained by their own
limited familiarity with new technologies);
such consultations begin in the proposal development
phase of projects
- Teams develop infrastructure tools with
the help of the Technology Director, which
are then shared with other teams
- Once such tools are fully developed and
tested, they are to be shared via open source
software to other institutions and the world
at large
- SHL is dedicated to technical applications
that are platform-independent and compliant
with ADA, web-accessibility, and usability
standards
|
Matchmaking
Partnerships are critical to our mission,
both for individual projects and for SHL as
a whole. SHL assumes an active role in building
such partnerships.
With other universities:
- University of California-Berkeley
- University of California-Los Angeles
- Kenyon College
- The Ohio State University
- Bryn Mawr College
- European College of the Liberal Arts
- Istituto Universitario di Lingue Moderne,
Milan
- London School of Economics
- Universita' degli Studi di Milano
- San Francisco State University
- Southern Illinois State University
With other units at Stanford:
- Cantor Center for the Visual Arts
- Information Technology Systems & Services
- Stanford University Libraries
With community organizations:
- San Francisco Chinese Opera Company
With major cultural institutions:
- Yerba Buena Center for the Arts
- Fondazione Mondadori, Milan
- The Wolfsonian (FIU), Miami Beach
|
Standards and Evaluation
Implementation of project and laboratory goals
is evaluated on an ongoing basis, with a mechanism
for evaluating outcomes planned for September
2004.
Evaluating individual projects:
- quarterly progress reports for each team,
covering infrastructure and content separately.
Emphasis on understanding obstacles; lessons
learned; benefit to individuals involved;
& gradual shifting of goals
- annual reports from student participants
- Student evaluations through Registrar for
courses related to projects
- annual renewal process, with interdisciplinary
selection committee representing campus, community,
and industry
- close oversight by SHL staff, as part of
consultation & mentorship responsibilities
Evaluating SHL interim effectiveness:
- careful analysis of website log statistics,
including by page, referrer, and domain
- statistics documenting increasing university
& community interest (in the form of phone
& email inquiries, undergrad volunteerism,
attendance at SHL events, enrollment in SHL
courses, application for funds, etc)
- external advisory board
|
|
|
|
|
|
|